本文主要讲述《公司法》中董事的职责，根据《公司法》第180条的法定职责，董事在作出商业决策时应谨慎和勤勉，以确保存在客观的谨慎标准。第181条规定，董事必须诚实行事，并必须有适当的目的和意图。第182条规定，董事不得滥用其在公司内的职位优势。第183条在类似的说明中指出，董事不应以不当的方式利用他们收到的信息。刑事罪行也列于第184条之下。本篇澳洲代写价格文章由澳洲论文通AssignmentPass辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
Under statutory duties section 180 of the corporation Act, the director should exercise care and diligence in his business decision making such that an objective standard-of-care exists. The section 181 states that director must act in good faith and must act with a proper purpose and intention. Section 182 specifies that the director must not abuse their position advantage within the company and in a similar note, section 183 states that they should not make use of information they receive in an improper manner. Criminal offenses are also laid out under section 184.
Under the common-law duties of acting in good faith, it could be said one of the director was not exercising good faith. A director has to be honest and open in any situation. In the case of Bill, it could be said he was not being honest and upfront. Bill was a majority shareholder in a resort in Broome where the new AGM meeting was being planned. Furthermore, it is identified that the vast majority of them were situated elsewhere and only two of the directors were actually situated in Broome. In the advice to Lucy, a breach of common law according as per duty to act bona fide for the interests of the company is recommended to be raised in the court. As cases like Whitehouse v Carlton Hotel Pty Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 285.
Walker v Wimborne (1976) 137 CLR 1 show this could be held as a breach in the court, because the director Bill did not exercise the rational judgment that anybody else would have exercised in the same situation. He was not honest and did not act in good faith as it appears he seemed to have acted with his own profit agenda in mind. This was not coherent with the maximization of benefits for the company or the best interests of the company. This is evident in the monetary loss the company would have to suffer when the AGM was shifted to Broome. The costs of taking the flight and accommodation put the amount to the AGM being held in Broome around $20,000 more, compared to holding it in Canberra. Section 180 of the objective standard of care and section 181 requiring action in good faith, under statutory duties has hence been breached in the same principle.
如果大家有什们疑问，随时联系澳洲论文通AssignmentPass辅导网，可为您提供澳洲Essay代写和澳洲Assignment代写服务!担保交易，满意后再付款!从此不再担心被坑，100%通过保障，让您放心，您还在犹豫什么呢?赶紧联系网站在线客服吧，有关澳洲论文代写的问题可以详细咨询我们!
