澳洲essay代写：亚太地区
亚太地区今天被认为是高度动态和不稳定的，但用于管理紧张局势的安全机制仍然是薄弱的，不存在或分散(Aqorau, 2012)。今天，该区域包含了关于敌对大国的多样性、基于领土的争端、历史上未解决的记忆、政治上有能力的意识形态、经济上的痛苦过渡、军事平衡的转移和文化的分歧。
苏联解体、冷战格局瓦解后，整个亚太地区地缘政治格局发生了戏剧性的变化(Aqorau, 2014, 52-75页)。这两个超级大国的两极平衡结束了，从而使区域参与者能够开始一种新的权力结构来平衡权力。
历史上，权力是通过一个国家的军事规模或经济增长来衡量的。然而，在今天，这种对权力的简单分析并不成立。需要考虑更多不同的工具集来分析不同参与者的相对能力和影响。以亚洲权力为基础的两极观点并不适合复杂的地区现实，随着权力区域开始变得多样化以及在自然界的扩散，两极观点将开始更少地适应。
然而，最可能的特征是不演变主要冲突，方程明显是5个大国结构的灵活均衡，在没有单个大国意味着霸权，而另一方面，中国和美国继续发挥主导作用(Kang, 2007)。美国、中国、日本、俄罗斯和印度是本地区的五大强国，它们现在已经转向合作与竞争，而不是对抗与勾结。
本文拟探讨亚太地区的电力配置分布，以评估未来的影响因素和发展前景(Sukma, 2003)。本文的范围还在于进一步认识到当代重要的问题，这些问题在亚太地区的权力配置问题上得到了本地区内外国家更多的关注和关注。
本文的主旨在于探讨亚太国家之间的权力结构，并了解各种因素，尤其是中美关系，以及这种关系如何影响了亚太地区的凝聚力和塑造了新的权力结构。尽管如此，这篇文章试图通过批判性评价东盟的现状、权力结构所产生的问题以及通过东盟所采取的政策审议选择，从而进一步有助于加强它们的地位和作用，从而得出结论。本文分为多个部分，每个部分都描述了亚太地区及其参与者的状况和范围。
澳洲essay代写：亚太地区
The region of Asia-Pacific is considered highly dynamic and unstable today but still the institution based security available for managing tensions are weak, not existing or scattered (Aqorau, 2012). Today, the region encompasses diversity regarding rival great powers, territory based disputes, unresolved memories historically, competent ideologies politically, painful transitions in economy, shifting balances of military and diverging cultures.
After Soviet Union collapsed and cold war structures diminished, the whole geopolitical landscape nature within the Asian-Pacific region changed in a dramatic way (Aqorau, 2014, pp. 52-75). The two superpowers bipolar equilibrium came to an end consequently allowing the regional players to commence a new power configuration for balancing the power.
Historically, power was measured through military size of a nation or its economic growth. Today, however this simplistic analysis of power does not stand true. More diverse tool sets need to be taken into consideration to analyse relative power and impact of distinct actors. The Asian power based bipolar view did not fit the complex region reality and as power regionally starts becoming diverse as well as diffused in nature, bipolar view will start fitting even less.
However, it is most likely to be characterized as evolving no main conflict and the equation is apparent as a flexible equilibrium of 5 power nation’s configuration where in no individual power implies hegemony while on the other hand, China and the US continue playing dominating roles (Kang, 2007). The 5 Great powers of this region are the US, China, Japan, Russia and India which have now taken a turn towards cooperating and competing rather than confronting and colluding.
This essay has been prepared to explore the power configuration distribution among the Asia Pacific regions in order to assess the factors along with development prospects in future (Sukma, 2003). The scope of this essay further lies in acknowledging the important issues of contemporary nature that have captured more focus and issues from nations internal and external to the region with regard to Asia-Pacific power configuration.
The essay thesis statement lies in exploring power configuration among the Asia-Pacific nations and also to understand various factors especially the relationship lying between the US and China and the way in which this relationship has affected the rallying forces and has shaped the new power configuration in the region. Being said that, this essay is an attempt made to conclude through critical evaluation the current posture of ASEAN, the issues arising from the power configuration and the options for policy consideration taken through ASEAN which further contributes towards strengthening their position and role. The essay is divided into various sections with each section describing the state and extent of Asia pacific region and its players.
