The engineer should not have been helping or abeting the practice of engineering unlawful by a firm or a person. Engineers should not have any knowledge about any allegedly violated code when relevantly reporting as per the adequate professional bodies (Billington, 2006). Engineer should be undertaking the assignment on qualifying the experience or education within the specifically involved technical fields. The engineers should not be affixing the signs provided to any documents or plans that deal with the matter of subject in which there is absence of competence. There is no preparation of any document or plan within their control and direction.
Engineers should be accepting assignment and assuming responsibilities to coordinate each and every project, while sealing and signing the documents of engineering for the complete project (Delatte, 2003). The engineer should have been truthful and objective in the reports, testimony or statements of professionalism. There appears to be an inclusion of the pertinent and relevant information in these testimonies, statements or reports for bearing the most recently indicated date. Engineers should be expressing technical opinions in public that are discovered on acknowledging the competence and facts within the respective matter (Freiman and Schlager, 1995).
The velocity of the wind was sufficiently strong for causing the establishment of mode of torsion, until there was an inevitable occurrence of the collapse. As a result of the failed centre span, the originally parabolic cables shaped as a free hanging catenary. Due to a number of wrong assumptions in the concepts of engineering and physics, the bridge ended up collapsing in the ocean below (Haberland et al., 2012). The below sections of this essay will analyse the case in terms of several ethical issues and role of professional engineering.