assignment代寫:藝術設計

assignment代寫:藝術設計

在《設計史》一書中,法倫(2010)提出了藝術史的史學,用於理解文化研究的理論和方法論,用於挖掘和理解知識的方法背後的認識論,以及其中的不同範式。

Fallan(2010)的論點是,男性文化不一定是精英文化,即使在文化之外的其他人看來是如此。只是日常事物以不同的方式塑造了人們的文化。因此,當一個人思考設計的歷史時,它不再是侷限於某些精英的歷史,而是更多的是通過不同的視角來解讀的歷史。不同的翻譯,交易,換位創造了文化的感知。

第一章是對所研究課題的史學考察。設計歷史的根源可以追溯到美術史。設計史家從一套藝術史學科起步,使其更適合當代和當代的課題,已經成爲一個獨立的分支。雖然藝術史上的遺產使人們能夠很好地理解設計藝術品,但也有一些問題趨勢必須加以解決。例如,有一些偏見和程度的概括。當人們把設計史作爲藝術史的一部分來討論時,往往更多地關注美學,而較少關注設計本身的各個方面。其次,設計師或藝術家被認爲更多的是研究的產物,而不是他們所創造的,從而產生了所謂的“英雄主義方法”。

assignment代寫:藝術設計

In “Design History” Fallan (2010), it presents a historiography of art history, the theory and methodology used towards understanding cultural studies, the epistemology behind the methods used for knowledge excavation and understanding, and the different paradigms in it.

Fallan (2010)’s argument is that the culture of men need not be an elite culture even if it appears to be so to others outside the culture. It is just that everyday things have shaped people’s cultures differently. Therefore, when one thinks about the design history, it can no longer be seen as a history restricted to some elite, but is more of one that is interpreted through different lens. Different translations, transactions, transpositions create the perceptions of culture.

The first chapter concerns itself with presenting a historiographic survey of the subject under study. The roots of design history are traced out from art history. Design historians started off with a set of art history subjects that made it more suitable for the contemporary topics and in more current times, have moved to become a separate branch. Although the heritage in art history enabled a good understanding of design artefacts, there were some problem tendencies that had to be addressed. For instance, there was some amount of bias and extent generalizations. When one discussed design history as a part of art history, there was a tendency to focus more on the aesthetics and less so on the aspects of design itself. Secondly, the designers or the artists were considered more as the product of studies than what they produced, resulting in what is called the “Heroic Approach”.