代写论文：澳大利亚建筑史
最突出的传播架构改革和抽象表现主义是明显2主要城市包括墨尔本和悉尼。这两个城市有关系,不仅仅是一个单纯的城市之间的文化差异,但每个城市的方式促进了现代主义和允许的传播表现主义在他们的建筑(芒福德1954)。澳大利亚相对短暂的建筑历史是由沃尔特·伯利和马里昂马赫尼格里芬和他们的工作似乎比较只有潜下心对全球的认可。最优秀的创造是墨尔本大学进一步扩大在整个年人才少,现在通过爱德蒙和克里甘架构师(讨论也是紧随其后)。大学建筑最初通过开发狮鹫与外墙建筑装饰语言,混合颜色,使用适当的材料,引用历史上使用。这个架构是一个新的体系结构描述新哥特式的角度来看,一个世纪后被视为后现代主义表达欲望和快乐的本质。建筑使用的狮鹫是想提高他们的个人哲学特别是优雅与神智学神学的关系和人智学神学。特别是通过使用这些信念所表达的是狮鹫的体积架构制定规划的经典公式。这个公式进一步包括利用阳光、阴影和精确的材料用于发展基于人格的建筑结构。的大部分建筑的狮鹫是由纽曼的石头削减大约和剃顺利(博伊斯1993)。石头锯齿状,形状的边缘,由门窗框架的中世纪的方式。在leadlight玻璃leadlight玻璃是一种水晶花瓶与终枝屋顶雕刻描绘冰和仍然虚弱是强大的教堂的尖塔。狮鹫进一步相信架构就业也代表人类和灵性。爱德蒙和克里甘也知道基于灵性价值和设计各种建筑宗教目的但他们的组织架构和人性意义上是不一样的怪兽。狮鹫不仅是时间的架构和当代还复杂一样生活在这个现代化的世界。架构师所属类别是景观建筑师。
代写论文：澳大利亚建筑史
The most prominent spread of architectural reform and abstract expressionism was evident in 2 main cities inclusive of Melbourne and Sydney. These two cities share a relationship which is not just a mere cultural difference between the cities but the way in which each city fostered modernism and allowed the spread of expressionism throughout their buildings (Mumford 1954). The relatively brief architectural history of Australia is dominated by Walter Burley and Marion Mahony Griffin and their work seems to be comparative only with Utzon with respect to global recognition. The most excellent creation was University of Melbourne which was expanded throughout the further years by less talented experts and now through Edmond and Corrigan architects (discussion on same is followed). The University building originally developed through the Griffins is architectural decoration language with facades, mixed colors and use of appropriate materials, and with references used historically. This architecture was a new architecture depicting neo-gothic perspective which after a century was considered as a post modernism expression constitutive of desires and delight. Architecture was used by the Griffins as a mean to enhance elegantly their philosophies personally especially their relationship with the Theosophy theology and Anthroposophy theology. These beliefs were expressed by the Griffins especially by using the volume of architecture to formulate a classic formula of planning. This formula was further inclusive of using sunlight, shadows and precisely used material for developing a personality based architectural structure. Most of the buildings by the Griffins are comprised by Newman stones which were cut roughly and shaved smoothly (Boyce 1993). The stones were jagged and shaped at the edges and consisted of framing for doors and windows in the manner which was medieval. In leadlight glazing leadlight glass was set in a form of crystal vase with finials on the rooftop sculptured to depict ice and still the frails were strong as a steeple of a church. The griffins further believed in architecture employment for representing humanity and also spirituality. Edmond and Corrigan also knew much on spirituality based values and they did design various buildings for religious purpose but their architecture for organizations and humanity sense was not same as that of the Griffins. The architecture of the Griffins was not only temporal and contemporary but also complicated just as living in this modernized world. The category to which the architects belong to is landscape architects.
