代写论文的网站:堕胎的道德

代写论文的网站:堕胎的道德

社会上真正的问题是决定什么是正确的道德道路,什么属性被认为是错误的。在许多情况下,这些都有明确的定义。明辨是非,选择正确的道德伦理道路并不难。然而,有人指出,在堕胎的情况下,对错是混淆不清的。堕胎中的伦理问题一直是社会上一个有争议的问题。在考虑堕胎的概念时,母亲的健康,包括母亲的身体和情感健康,已被考虑在内。胎儿被认为是一个无辜的人,他被支持生命的人残忍地杀害。这个概念有许多方面。亲生命还是亲选择是当今时代被广泛讨论的问题,在本文的分析中对此进行了详细的探讨。

在阅读了各种各样的文学作品,并从各个方面进行研究之后,我认为,一个支持选择的立场是社会所需要的道德道路。我们不知道生命是在初始阶段还是在某个特定的时间之后。

法律框架

在美国,堕胎于1900年初被禁止。只有在罗伊诉韦德案之后,美国才允许堕胎。在罗伊诉韦德案中,法院裁定允许在怀孕的前三个月堕胎。妇女应根据母亲的健康状况作出决定。法院提出的法律论点的基础是《宪法》和对妇女的基本人权考虑。2003年,布什政府签署了部分堕胎法,规定晚期堕胎是非法的。2007年,冈萨雷斯诉卡哈特一案的判决支持这项法律。然后是超声波法的颁布,妇女在决定堕胎前应该看超声波。许多州都颁布了胎儿疼痛法。它认为胎儿从20周早期就能感觉到疼痛。

关于堕胎的法律解释一直让人们感到困惑。但该指导方针明确规定了个人在堕胎问题上的选择。已经采取了许多立场,而人民采取的反对立场则被夸大了。根据这项法律,堕胎是一个广受争议的问题,目前还没有就堕胎和相关案件采取强有力的立场。

代写论文的网站:堕胎的道德

Real issues in society is deciding what is the right moral path and what attributes are considered to be wrong. In many cases, these are clearly defined. There is a clear wrong and right and hence choosing the right moral ethical pathway is not difficult. However, it has been observed that in the cases of abortion, there is a confusion as to what is right or wrong. Ethics in abortion has always been a contentious issue in the society. Health of the mother including the physical and the emotional well being of the mother has been factored in while considering the notions of abortion. The fetus has been considered as an innocent human being who is brutally murdered by the pro life proponents. There are many dimensions to this notion. Pro life or pro choice is the issue that has been widely discussed in the current times and this aspect has been probed in detail in this analysis.

After reading a wide variety of literature and looking into the various facets, I would argue a pro choice stand as the permissible moral path that is required in the societies. It is not known that life would be at inception or after a certain time.

Legal Framework

In the United States, abortion was banned in early 1900. It was only after the case or Roe v. Wade abortion was made permissible in the United States. In the case of Roe v Wade, the courts ruled that abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy is allowed. Women should make decisions based on the health of the mother. The basis for the legal argument presented by the courts was the constitution and basic human rights considerations for the women. In 2003 Bush administration signed the partial abortion law that made abortions illegal in the late term conditions. In 2007, the case of Gonzalez v Carhart ruled in favor of this law. Then came the enactment of the ultrasound law where women should look at the ultrasound before making the decision to abort the child. Fetal pain laws have been enacted in many states. It contends that the fetus can feel pain from early 20 weeks onward.

Interpretation of the laws regarding abortion has been widely confusing to the people. But the guidelines are clear to make individual choices regarding abortion. There are many stands that have been taken and the opposing stand taken by the people are exaggerated. According to the law, abortion is a widely debated issue and a strong stand for abortion and related cases are yet to be taken.