代写论文：重商主义
然而，重商主义并非没有问题。像法国这样的国家的重商主义特点是平民反对增加税收，他们必须支付给统治者。 Soupirs收藏品描述了这个王国如何向商人征收可怕的过量税收。王国收集了所有的钱和盈余，这导致了商业活动的衰落。在目前的市场经济体中，这种情况是人们不会注意到的，在一些税收适用的情况下，商人既有权谈判他们必须支付的税收，又能继续盈利。此外，在法国重商主义的古典时期，国际贸易也被禁止。禁止外国货物进入该国。这是为了保护当地贸易，但是这种保护机制导致了当地贸易的破坏。这些时代和后古典时期的经济过程主要是由君主和专制劳动力驱动的，因此，经济理解为支持所有人的东西，而不仅仅是君主或国家的统治者。
代写论文：重商主义
商人和作家的一些话语如1513-1577年的托马斯史密斯先生讨论了积累事物的个人动力。史密斯提出个人的自我利益几乎是一种自然的生活方式。因此许多政策都是这样构建的，但之后他们受到立法的压制。史密斯认为，这种自我利益必须由政府统一管理和制定共同目标。这将有助于激励那些努力争取奖励的人，而不是让政府从他们那里获得全部奖励。政府援助商人的工作也必须为他们提供经济激励。此外，这是为了提高个人的盈利能力，因此政府与他们合作。现在这些思维在一定程度上符合现代市场理论，因为现代市场理论在政府贸易监管中也发挥着重要作用。贸易法规和立法要求由其运营所在国家的公司来满足，并与国际国家合作。然而，即使史密斯提出的这些论点也不完全关注商人的利益。商人的利益将受益于国际贸易，现代经济理论为政府促进国际化提供了方式。但是，就约翰史密斯爵士的论点来说，这与当时的许多其他重商主义者一致，可以说他们反对出口原毛，并且想要在该国建立生产单位并自己生产呢绒布。
代写论文：重商主义
However, mercantilism is not without its problems. Mercantilism in countries like France is characterized by opposition by commoners to the increasing tax that they had to be pay to the ruler. The Soupirs collection writes about how the kingdom has frightful and excessive taxes levied on the merchants. The Kingdom collected all the money and surpluses and this led to the declination of commerce activities. This is something that one would not observe in the current market economies where with some application of taxation, the merchants are both given the power to negotiate the taxes they have to pay, and continue to make profits. Furthermore, in pre-classical times of the mercantilists in France, international trading was also prohibited. Foreign goods were prohibited into coming into the country. This was done with the intention of protecting local trade but then this very protection mechanism led to the destruction of local trade. Economic processes in these times and in later pre-classical era were driven mostly by monarchs and despotic workings and hence the understanding of economy as something supportive of all people and not just monarchs or rulers of state was missing.
代写论文：重商主义
Some discourses of merchants and authors like Sir Thomas Smith of 1513-1577 discuss the individual drive for accumulation of things. Individual self-interest is presented by Smith almost as a natural way to live life. Many of the policies were hence to be constructed this way, but then they were repressed by legislation. Smith believed that this self-interest must be governed and properly directed by the government by setting up a common goal. This would serve to motivate people who would work towards a reward rather than have the government take the entire reward from them. Government in aiding the work of merchants must also provide them with economic incentives. Also, this is to improve the profitability of the individuals and hence the government worked with them. Now these thinking to a certain extent are in line with modern market theories, because modern market theories also give a significant role to governments in the regulation of trade. There are trade regulations and legislative requirements to be met by companies within the country where it operates and in addition where it works with international countries. However, even such arguments made by Smith are not completely focused on merchant interests. Merchant interests would benefit from international trade and modern economic theories dictate such ways for the government to promote internationalization. However, in the case of Sir John Smith’s argument which is in line with many other mercantilists of the time, it could be said that they were against exporting of raw wool, and wanted to have manufacturing units within the country and manufacture woolen cloth by themselves.
