哈佛reference格式：争论的批判性分析
本文的主要目的在于批判性地分析文献中关于度假村或水疗中心运营和发展的一个具体论点。选择的主题是度假酒店所有权。本文的论点是关于酒店是否应该独立或者是否应该有一个度假村连锁的度假酒店所有权。这是从独立操作报表和水疗的操作人员的角度来看的。独立运营商的问题是，度假村需要与这些视角相关的多个视角和责任，这些视角需要在运营中遵循和实现。然而，独立运营商有时会发现很难处理其酒店的多个单元，因为每个酒店和水疗中心的需求、挑战和含义是不同的。因此，品牌与独立的争论在度假村或酒店管理领域已经成为热门话题。
哈佛reference格式：争论的批判性分析
毫无疑问，很难将这一领域的增长归结为少数概念，但所有者大多质疑连锁加盟成本或利益，网络的分布和营销已经戏剧性地拉平。还发生了其他一些变化，比如顾客忠诚度的概念不再是以前的样子。本文将提出一些赞成和反对所选论点的观点。
哈佛reference格式：争论的批判性分析
The key aim in this paper lies in critically analyzing one specific argument presented in literature with regard to resorts or spas operations and development. The topic selected is resort ownership. The argument on which the paper is developed is related to resort ownership on whether hotels should be independent or whether there should be a chain of resorts. This is from the perspective of operators operating the report and spas independently. The issue with independent operators is that resorts require multiple perspectives and responsibilities related to these perspectives which need to be followed and implemented within the operations. However, independent operators at times find it difficult to handle multiple units of their hotels since the needs, challenges and implication for each hotel and spas are different. Therefore, the debate of brand versus being independent has become popular within the resort or hotel management field.
哈佛reference格式：争论的批判性分析
There is no doubt that it is difficult to attribute the growth in this domain to only few conceptions but owners mostly question the chain affiliation costs or benefit, distribution of web and marketing which have leveled dramatically. There are other changes which have also occurred such as the concept of loyalty of customers not being the way it was before. The paper will bring forward several perspectives in favor and against the selected argument.
