论文代写：道德权利
道德权利:道德权利是基于一个通用理论或者一个特定的文化或宗教的道德原则。然而,道德上的权利在这种情况下可以基于人性的一个最重要的原则。道德观察,ITP资格增长其业务在所有可能的方法就是限制治理的法律体系在该地区的业务。因此,如果他们从Prusskov操作,他们被允许向美国和其他国家出售毒品Prusskov没有任何限制出口这种药物用于执行。然而,美国监狱中的囚犯也受到更自由的道德权利的惩罚方式,尽管它是死刑。被注入药物惩罚他们死在他们的身体是否认他们的道德责任提供了一个清晰的死刑的过程。在不同的角度,如果道德权利也认为是自然权利,那么公司在道德上是错误的在贩卖毒品危害他人,因为所有人都有一个自然权利用自己的方式过自己的生活。道德权利ITP如果应用基于他们自己的道德规则,然后它不提供在他们的行为是道德的目的。因此ITP的行为在道德上是错误的,因为他们是违反道德的人也有权利平等的道德权利在更自由的生活和死亡。
论文代写：道德权利
Moral Rights: Moral rights are based on a universal theory or rather a moral principles of a particular culture or a religion. However, moral rights in this case can be based on a single most important principle of humanity. Morally observed, ITP is eligible for growing its business in all possible methods which is in limit to the legal system of governance in the region of their operations. Thus, if they are operating from Prusskov, they are allowed to sell drugs to the US and other countries as Prusskov does not have any restrictions of exporting such drugs used for execution. However, the prisoners in the US jails also have a moral right of being subjected to a more liberal way of punishment, even though it is capital punishment. Punishing them to death by infusing drugs in their body is denying them their moral duty of being offered a clearer process of death penalty. In a different perspective, if moral rights are also considered as natural rights, then the company is morally wrong in selling drugs which harms other people, because all individuals have a natural right to live their own life in their own way. Moral rights of ITP if based on their own set of morality rules are applied, then it does not serve the purpose of being morally right in their actions. Thus ITP’s actions are morally wrong because, they are violating the moral rights of others who also have equal moral right to live and die in a more liberal way.
