论文代写：加拿大税收
加拿大有高额的双重课税，一种是所有企业都享有的联邦税率，另一种是适用于在这些省份经营的公司的地方税。以4%的最低利率和16%的最高利率，企业很难证明他们的经营和预期的利润。如果加拿大考虑统一的税收制度，单一税法适用于所有公司，那么它将对公司有吸引力。这将增加省级地区的商业投资，目前由于税收增加而缺乏持续增长。不需要加拿大联邦税率降低到10%的低点,而是引入新的提供免税的政策下一致的制造业投资,就业创造,等。加拿大最好的移动可以减轻,为美国贸易的依赖,甚至胜过试图重新谈判北美自由贸易协定的协议。与其他有兴趣使加拿大成为其制造业之家的国家相联系，将是平衡贸易依赖的正确步骤，以使其与现在的公民比现在更安全。尽管特朗普对《北美自由贸易协定》(NAFTA)不感兴趣，而重新谈判要求他放弃，但许多经济学家都在淡化它，因为它对美国具有地理上的统一非常重要(帕内塔，2016)。特朗普的遣返税率为10%，目的是为了吸引在国际市场上囤积的数万亿美元的资金，因为他们担心提高税收，这是为了增加税收。因此，这对加拿大来说并不是一个巨大的威胁。
论文代写：加拿大税收
Canada has high amounts of double taxation, one is the federal tax rates common for all corporate and other is the provincial taxes applied to corporations operating in these provinces. With the lowest rate at 4% and the highest at 16%, it is difficult for corporations to justify their operations and anticipated profits. If Canada mulls a uniform tax system where a single tax code is applied to all corporations, it would be attractive for corporation. This will shoot up business investments in provincial regions, currently lacking consistent growth due to higher taxes. There is no need to reduce Canada’s federal tax rates to a low of 10%, but instead introduce new policies of offering tax exemptions under consistent manufacturing investments, job creations, etc. The best move Canada can make is to lessen, and it is over dependence on US trade, where even Trump is trying to renegotiate the NAFTA agreement. Tying up with other nations interested to make Canada their manufacturing home will be the right step in balancing its trade dependence so as to keep it and the citizens safer than they now are. Despite Trump’s disinterest in NAFTA and renegotiation request his scrapping, it completely is being played down by many economists, as it is important for the US to have geographical unity (Panetta, 2016). Trump’s repatriation tax rates of 10% is to lure back trillions of money stashed in international markets fearing higher taxes, which is to build tax revenues. Hence, it is not a big threat to Canada.
