论文代写：民主选举
低由欧洲选举中选民的支持是1994年和1993年的大选。这被认为是英国的结果多数选举制度阻碍了人们投票支持绿党的选票可能浪费(Bluhdorn 2004)。此外,少数民族和较小的政党有非常低的机会去赢得一个席位在国民议会。1989年欧洲议会选举中,由英国绿党虽然他们没有赢得席位获得大约10.4%的选票。因此,主查询是在英国系统旨在降低影响和参与的小政党提供强有力的政府,在这种情况下有可能小党派将影响每一个政党制度。绿党以零结束在众议院席位,尽管当时他们第三大党党员20000人。
然而,在瑞典为例,5.5%的议会的存在所获得的绿色Miljopartiet公关系统,仍然没有太多导致政府困难Vansterpartiet和社会Demokraterna党在1988年的选举中赢得了50%的多数选票。
在这种情况下,政治上的成功如果定义为绿色政党的浓度测量的国家议会的席位数量赢得绿党对整个国家政府席位。此外,绿色政党面临的挑战集中在办公室收到的询问,那些贪婪和policy-seeking依赖4功能:参与pre-coalition安全席位,而不像在瑞典容忍少数政府上任,拉拢到政府和不显示任何强烈绿色仍然存在和谈判立场在选举后(贝茨1990)。大型机构传统角色被绿色政党UGS的正常权利女子项目,人权倡导者、生态和单边裁军。焦点的变化对建立一个强有力的公正党制定绿色政治的作用在英国,瑞典和德国。在每个国家,这post-materialistic思维方式支持和快速动员大量生成。
论文代写：民主选举
Low electoral support was brought in by the European election of 1994 and the general election of 1993. This was regarded as the consequence of the British majority electoral system which discourages people to vote for the Greens as the vote might be wasted (Bluhdorn 2004). Moreover, minority and smaller parties have very low chances to win a seat in the National parliament. In the European election of 1989, no seats were won by the British Greens although they gained about 10.4% of the votes. Hence, the main query is that in UK where the system is designed to lower the impact and participation of the small parties so as to provide strong government, in these circumstances is there a possibility that small parties would every impact the party system. The Greens ended with zero seats in the lower house even though at that time they were the third largest party with about 20000 strong party membership.
However, in Sweden for example, 5.5% of the parliamentary presence was gained by the Green Miljöpartiet in PR system and still it was not that much to result in government difficulties for the Vansterpartiet and Social Demokraterna party which in the 1988 election won 50% of the majority votes.
In this case, political success if defined as concentration of Green Parties in a national parliament which is measured by number of seats won by Green party with respect to the overall seats in the national government. Moreover, the challenge for the Green parties which focus on office-seeking, vote-seeking and policy-seeking is dependent on 4 features which are: participation in pre-coalition to secure seats, without taking office like in Sweden tolerating a minority government and co-opted into government and without showing any strong Green presence remained there and negotiating position during post-election (Betz 1990). Large establishment traditional role was taken by the Green Parties in UGS of normal rights as women’s program, human rights advocate, ecology and unilateral disarmament. The change of focus towards creation of a strong justice party was to formulate a role for Green politics in UK, Sweden and Germany. In each nation, this post-materialistic way of thinking generated support and mobilized large groups rapidly.
