论文代写：品牌形象
社会分析方面,公司的举措与麦当劳和可口可乐的收购似乎营销策略,远离最初的核心原则的“清白”,距离从环保形象投射到现在。这有很大的机会影响品牌形象。在技术方面,公司似乎大大落后于没有有效地利用社会媒体工具本身作为一个领导者在果汁市场的地位。根据环境分析,其近乎完美的可持续性的承诺表示,一个异常,自2011年以来,该品牌的使用可回收的资源仅停留在35%。这再次引发了成本问题,需要处理充分的创始人。最后,根据法律分析,品牌不是已经设法保持相对的活动,除了一些小案例。然而,他们是合法的,造成了强烈的打击,无法证明他们的商标的绝对所有权(solicitorjournal,2013)和失去一个起诉Deepend新鲜复苏有限。这大大损害了其道德形象(相关性无辜的冰沙,2014)。
论文代写：品牌形象
lagging behind considerably in not tapping social media tools effectively to position itself as a leader in the fruit juice market. According to the environment analysis,its near-perfect commitment to sustainability is indicated, with an exception that since 2011 the brand’s use of recyclable resources stops at a mere 35%. This again raises cost issues, which will need to be dealt with adequately by the founders. Last of all, as per the legal analysis, the brand has managed to remain relatively blemish-free in its activities, barring a few minor cases. They however, were dealt a strong blow legally, in being unable to justify their absolute ownership of the trademark (solicitorjournal, 2013) and losing a lawsuit against Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited. This has considerably tarnished its ethical image (Relevance of Innocent Smoothies, 2014).
