本文主要讲的是《商标法》案例分析，公司应该考虑遵循和使用环保系统，有时减少燃料的排放。政治环境对航空业有着至关重要的意义。沃尔玛面临的政治因素问题包括税收、腐败和政治稳定。沃尔玛具有稳定的强大的政治背景的国家经营业务。沃尔玛(Wal-Mart)已开始考虑在全球航空业推行其最具机会主义和雄心勃勃的计划。沃尔玛持有经营其商业机构的许可证，同时由于燃料价格上涨，沃尔玛考虑控制石油的使用。本篇ps代写文章由澳洲论文通AssignmentPass辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
The company should consider following and using the system of environment protection, at times decreasing emission of fuel. The political environment is of crucial significance for the industries of airlines. The issues of political factors faced by Wal-Mart include tax, corruption and political stability. Wal-Mart has stability of strong political background of nations for running the business. Wal-Mart has started to consider their most opportunistic and ambitious process of initiatives across the aviation industry of the world. Wal-Mart holds a license of running their business organization, while it considers controlling the use of oil due to increasing price of fuel.
In this particular case, the decision was taken by the court regarding the key circumstance under which the design of a product can be considered distinctive, and hence, can be protected, under the action of infringing unregistered dress of trade under section 43 (a) of the Trademark Act of 1946. Samara Brothers Inc., as the respondent has been designing and manufacturing a line of clothing for children. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., as the petitioner came in contract with the supplier for manufacturing outfits on the basis of the photographs of Samara garments.
After it discovered that Wal-Mart, along with a number of other retailer were initiating sale of the same product, the case was filed by Samara under the notion of, inter alia, infringing unregistered dress of trade under section 43 (a) of the Trademark Act. The decision of the jury was in favor of Samara. Wal-Mart then considered renewing a motion to make the judgment in accordance with law, under the claim that there was lack of evidence for supporting a conclusion that clothing designs of Samar could obtain legal protection in the name of distinctive trade dress under section 43 (a). There was denial by the district court regarding the relief and motion awarded to Samara. The Second Circuit gave an affirmation for denying the motion.
如果大家有什们疑问，随时联系澳洲论文通AssignmentPass辅导网，可为您提供澳洲Essay代写和澳洲Assignment代写服务!担保交易，满意后再付款!从此不再担心被坑，100%通过保障，让您放心，您还在犹豫什么呢?赶紧联系网站在线客服吧，有关澳洲论文代写的问题可以详细咨询我们!
