代写论文：同性婚姻
同性恋者成为异性恋和直人成为同性恋。可能的问题,新的同性恋人们争取他们的权利吗?这个论点提出了许多同性恋者,但这一观点弱在某种程度上,因为这种情况下是不可能的。生活在一个国家没有方向,相信将土地变成一个混乱的情况。美国出平等权利的土地一但这个场景永远不能成为一个有效的和令人信服的理由让同性婚姻。成为平等的基础上的性取向在一定程度上是有效的,因为人们认为,少数民族像西班牙人、印度人、中国人,墨西哥人,非洲人等都应得到平等的权利。这些少数民族也是社会的一部分,必须平等对待。这个论点很有说服力,表明基于性取向平等。参数如同性婚姻是不朽的和恐吓婚姻制度的反对同性恋婚姻。这个论点是同意某种程度上因为婚姻的宪法及其机构讨论圣经,人们应该遵循。宗教就像佛教接受同性恋关系和庆祝这一关系的幸福。这里的论点不是关于基督教的宗教,而是追求的概念作为一个有效的机构法律造成的。另一方面反对这一概念表明,圣经没有站在美国的立法。宗教自由意味着权利的自由。
代写论文：同性婚姻
Gay people became straight and straight people became gay. The question arises that is it possible that the new gay people will struggle for their rights? This argument is presented by many gays but this argument is weak to an extent because such a situation is not possible. Living in a state with no directions and believes would land into a chaotic situation all over. America is the land that gives equal rights to ever one but this scenario can never become a valid and compelling reason for allowing gay marriages in the country. Becoming equal on the base of sexual orientation is valid to an extent because people argue that minorities like Hispanics, Indians, Chinese, Mexicans, and Africans etc. should be given equal rights. These minorities are also a part of the society and must be treated equally. This argument is compelling that suggests about the equality based on sexual orientation. Arguments like gay marriages are immortal and scare the institution of marriage are given against gay marriages in the country. This argument is agreed to an extent because the constitution of marriage and its institution is discussed in Bible and people should follow that. Religions like Buddhism accept gay relations and celebrate the happiness of this relationship. The argument here is not about the religion but about pursuing the concepts of Christianity as a valid institution of law making. On the other hand arguments against this concept suggest that Bible has no standing in law making of America. Freedom of the religion suggests the freedom of right also.