代写论文：个人改变
个人可以改变一种或多种态度。他们需要解决二分法的观点并达成一致的解决方案（Harmon-Jones，Amodio和Harmon-Jones，2009）。个人需要改变某些意识形态。这是需要解决的不协调中最重要的因素。想要戒烟的人必须解决以前的不和谐问题，并说服自己需要改变有害的行为。这种不和谐的模式是最重要的因素（Aronson，1992）。但是，人们需要减少不和谐。这可以通过使用知识系统来实现。吸烟者确信吸烟正在帮助解决他们的问题，并为他们的行为辩护。通过阅读最新信息，可以了解吸烟过程中涉及的固有问题。这些信息必须是明确的，并证明吸烟有害的类比。这会让人们了解不协调的根源，并让他们自己相信所涉及的问题。
代写论文：个人改变
个人需要降低以前持有的看法的重要性。一个人可以说服自己活下去，而不用担心长期的影响（Leventhal和Cleary，1980）。可以关注感官上的即时满足，而不是关注人们的长期影响。鼓励个人进行成本和收益分析。他们需要了解他们行为的根源，并且了解哪些对他们长期和短期更有利（Wicklund和Brehm，2013）。必须鼓励他们研究这种情况的长期方面，并且如果他们真的想从这种情况中获得特定的结果，就做出决定（Petty and Brinol，2010）。吸烟者需要问自己，眼前的满足是否值得在未来产生有害的副作用。还有人们为了确定结果需要做出的案例情景分析。需要权衡最好的和最糟糕的结果。他们需要根据这种模式做出决定。这种方法存在局限性。这在下面解释
代写论文：个人改变
The individuals can change one or more attitudes. They need to address the dichotomous view and arrive at a consonant solution (Harmon‐Jones, Amodio and Harmon‐Jones, 2009). The individuals need to change certain ideologies. This is the most important factor in the dissonance that needs to be addressed. The individual who wants to stop smoking must address the previous dissonance and convince themselves that they need to change the detrimental behaviour. This mode of dissonance is the most important factor (Aronson, 1992). However, the people need to reduce dissonance. This can be achieved by using knowledge systems. The smokers have convinced themselves that smoking is helping with their issues and have justified their action in their mind. By reading on the latest information, there can be understanding of the innate issues that are involved in the smoking process. This information must be definitive and prove the analogy that smoking is detrimental. This would cause the people to understand about the roots of the dissonance and convince themselves of the issues involved.
代写论文：个人改变
The individual needs to reduce the importance of the previously held perceptions. A person can convince themselves to live for the moment and not worry about the long-term impacts (Leventhal and Cleary, 1980). There could be focus on the sensual immediate gratification rather than focus on the long-term impacts of the people. The individuals are encouraged to undertake a cost and benefit analysis. They need to understand the roots of their behaviour and understand which is more beneficial for them in the long and short term (Wicklund and Brehm, 2013). They must be encouraged to look into the long-term aspects of the situation and make the decision if they really want a particular outcome from the situation (Petty and Brinol, 2010). The smokers need to ask themselves if the immediate gratification is worth the detrimental side effects in the future. There is also the case scenario analysis that the people need to make in order to determine the outcome. The best possible and the worst possible outcome needs to be weighed in. They need to make a determination based on this paradigm. There are limitations to this approach. This are explained in the following