论文代写：策略分析
在策略3中考虑涉众的含义。根据权利，似乎BR没有违反任何东西。它既没有接受新的商业技术，也没有走出阻止它的道路。然而，BR公司已经侵犯了股东的权利，比如公司的投资者，他们有责任将利润最大化。在战略4中，BR应讨论这一战略，以确保所有的投资者和其他利益相关者都参与进来，并强调这样一项计划，尽管在当前的时间内，公司的成本将是一项有利可图的投资。策略5对所有利益相关者都有负面影响，在功利主义和权利伦理和策略下都是完全不道德的，这确保了每个人的利益，并且在权利理论下也是道德的。策略7类似于策略2。然而，这里并没有说明，BR只会调整支持盈利能力的元素。因此，在考虑利益相关者的不利和有益影响时，这种适应性比策略2的整体水平要好。如果这项技术有任何缺陷，那么测试它的专门研究团队将会通过以下策略帮助每个人。
论文代写：策略分析
Consider stakeholder implications in the case of strategy 3. By virtue of rights, it might appear that BR has not have breached anything here. It has neither accepted a new business technology nor has gone out of the way to stop it. However, BR has breached rights to stakeholders such as investors in the company to whom BR holds a due responsibility to maximize profits. In strategy 4, BR should discuss this strategy to ensure all its investors and other stakeholders are on board and highlight that such a plan albeit costing the company in current times would be a profitable venture over time. Strategy 5 has negative implications for all stakeholders and is completely unethical under both utilitarianism and rights ethics and strategy 6 ensures that everybody profits and also is ethical under the rights theory. Strategy 7 is similar to strategy 2. However, it is not stated here that BR will only adapt elements that support profitability. Therefore, this adaptation is on an overall level better than strategy 2 when stakeholder adverse and beneficial implications are considered. If the technology is flawed in any way, then the dedicated research team that is testing it, would be helping everybody by following strategy 8.