论文代写：中国企业家的民主
作者解释了为什么中国的民营企业家不要求民主。她还解释了为什么中国的政治经济在没有政权更迭的情况下发生了重大转变。作者认为，中国不可能成为过去政治经济模式的一部分。在一些比较模型的基础上，它确实给出了与研究中一些常见解释相关的期望的定义。
该书指出，与英国、法国和美国等其他国家的企业家相比，中国企业家的力量有限。在这些国家，不同的企业家为实现他们的物质利益而大声疾呼反对政府。
论文代写：中国企业家的民主
为了实现这一目标，已经进行了一些释放出来的民主变革，这些变革造福于人民。如果假设政府背后有自私自利的动机，那么它对整个社会是有益的(Tsai, 2007)。蔡明介明确表示，这些措施不能在中国的企业家身上实施，因为他们更依赖于具有适应性的非正式机构。由于同样的原因，他们被阻止去做和实施一些对整个中国有利的改变。她明确指出，实施改革的那些规定主要只惠及物质利益，而非人民。这一进程进一步促进了中国在不诉诸任何形式的代议制的情况下促进和鼓励资本主义发展的能力。
论文代写：中国企业家的民主
The author has given the explanation why the private entrepreneurs of China are not demanding for democracy. She also gives the explanation why there has been a significant transformation in the political economy of China with the absence of the change in the regime. The author suggests that China cannot be the part of the models related to the political economy which exists from the previous times. It indeed gives the definition of the expectations related to some of the familiar explanations in the study based on some of the comparative models.
The book states that entrepreneurs in China have a limited power in comparison to the entrepreneurs of other nations such as England, France and United states. In these nations, the different entrepreneurs have raised their voice against the governments for fulfilling their material interests.
论文代写：中国企业家的民主
In order to implement the same, a number of unleashed democratic changes have been implemented which have benefitted the people. In case it is assumed that there are self-serving motives of the government behind the same, it is useful for the society as a whole (Tsai, 2007). Tsai clearly states that these things cannot be implemented on entrepreneurs in China as they are more dependent on the adaptive informal institutions. Because of the same, they are prevented from doing and implementing some of the changes which would prove to be beneficial for China as a whole. She has specified that those regulations in which the changes are implemented mostly benefit just the material interest and not the people. This process further promotes the ability of China to promote and encourage the growth of capitalism without invoking any kind of representative governance.