论文代写：种族群体
哈里森(1999)证实，同一种族的人之间的交流交流是一种根深蒂固的策略，以维持他们的种族。这是正确的，因为种族群体的仇恨是他们与另一个人的同一性的表征，而不是他们巨大而光荣的差异。他们对这些差异很好，但与特定的民族或文化相比，他们并不快乐。具有讽刺意味的是，一个种族群体在很大程度上是秘密的，他们在同一集团的成员中，而不是其他种族的成员之间，分享他们固有的根源和信仰的秘密。李宇春(2015)举了一个当代的例子，当台湾和香港市民被赋予同样的身份和文化的中国人。这是一个强烈的迹象，表明种族群体是有原则的，并没有被现代主义的诱惑所左右，他们试图在单一文化中被包容。他们的外在习惯、生活方式和行为举止都显示出他们对彼此的爱和尊重。亲密的秘密很少被公开，而这仍然隐藏着，并保持着他们的种族的强大和不受压抑的身份。
论文代写：种族群体
Harrison (1999) confirms that the communicative exchanges between people of the same ethnic group are a proof of some deep rooted strategies to sustain their ethnicity. This is true because the ethnic groups’ hatred is the symptom of the sameness of their identity with another and not in their large and glorified differences. They are fine with the differences, but are not happy when they are compared with a specific ethnic group or a culture. This is evident in the irony that an ethnic group is largely secretive in sharing the intimate secrets of their inherent roots and beliefs among the members of the same group but not other ethnic groups. Li (2015) gives a contemporary example when the Taiwanese and Hong Kong citizens are thrown in the same identity and culture of the Chinese. This is a strong indication that ethnic groups are principled and are not swayed by the lures of modernist attempts to be subsumed in a monoculture. Large displays of their external habits, lifestyle and conduct are just an indication for the public to display their love and respect to one another. Intimate secrets are seldom made public and this remains hidden and maintains a strong and unsubdued identity of their ethnicity.