代写论文:国际法律和人权的挑战
问题:“法律,因为它存在于国内社会,没有在国际政治。即使国际法存在,它是无效的在影响国家或在塑造行为的国际活动的过程和结果。州只有在自身利益时遵守国际法。对国际法相关规定,规范和原则必须能够影响和塑造国际活动的过程和结果独立于权力的考虑。这是国际法律现实主义的挑战。“你同意吗?为什么或为什么不呢?提供相关的例子来支持你的论点。
答:
主要争端是国际法律norms-do改变状态在听话的利益的行为。国际法的承诺是提议创建一个可靠的奉献到一个特定的平面位置。批准条约的责任会期望在塑造国际活动的过程和结果,为国家打破将是昂贵的。一个国际法律意味着政府提高声誉的费用食言,与国家行为的主要结果。让我们证明这种影响在国际公法的背景下承诺的钱,一般领域州获得不公平地主权决策地位。州只是遵守国际准则同时在自身利益采取行动。
Question: “Law, as it exists in domestic societies, has no place in international politics. Even if international law exists, it is ineffective in influencing the behaviour of states or in shaping the course and outcomes of international events. States only comply with international law when it is in their self-interest to do so. For international law to be relevant rules, norms and principles must be able to influence and shape the course and outcomes of international events independently of power considerations. This is the realist challenge to international law.” Do you agree? Why or Why not? Provide relevant examples to support your arguments.
Answer:
Main dispute is that international legal norms-do change State’s interests in obedient behaviour. International law commitment is a proposal to create a reliable dedication to a specific plan position. The approval of treaty responsibilities lifts expectations in shaping the course and outcomes of international events, once made, are pricey for States to break. An International Law is one means that governments look to raise the reputation expenses of reneging, with major outcomes for state behaviour. Let us demonstrate this influence in the context of the public international law commitment of money, a field where States commonly have secured invidiously their sovereign decision-making standing. States just comply with international norms whilst it is in their self-interest to act so.
