代写论文：备忘录

谅解备忘录协会指出,一个公司,在这种情况下,一个私人有限公司,需要有公司至少有一个成员分享。这是三位经理完成的,大卫,乔治,和尼克拥有一定数量的股票在他们的名字,并包括至少一个与他们分享哦。备忘录认为这要求公司的每一个州是他们的名字如果注册办公室位于英格兰,威尔士,威尔士和苏格兰国家公司的对象。备忘录指出,任何个人或更愿意组成一个公司需要合并的公司(Ukcorporator.gov或没有任何责任。英国,2014),他们已经完成了他们自己没有太多责任,但并不是所有股东。备忘录还说,它必须有公司类型是否与无限责任有限公司,女贞有限责任有限公司,这是由三个业主履行他们宣布这是私人有限责任有限公司。这意味着他们将不会承担额外保护普通股东损失发生的但在恶化或有辱人格的,他们可能只是偿还债务账上。冗余的谅解备忘录以来推出的章程,要求文章彻底阅读以任何方式开展业务。尼克感到不满意和犹豫的能够得到公平的价格通过出售其股份的现有股东是合法的,但他的行为不是试图把股票卖给他的合作伙伴或内部股东是不可取的。在试图卖给现有股东之前,尼克试图出售它直接向外部股东和带来一个局外人违反章程的要求他把它卖给现有股东,否则他可以达到一个局外人和出售股票。尼克已经违反了文章后,大卫和乔治可以上诉法院对尼克试图出售其股份的行为没有通知他们,一个局外人。

代写论文：备忘录

The Memorandum of Association states that a company, in this case a private limited company, needs to have the members of the company to have at least one share each. This is being fulfilled by the three owners, David, George, and Nick who own certain amount of shares in their name, and includes at least one share ach with them. The memorandum states that it is required for every company to state their name if their registered office is to be situated in England, Wales, Wales or Scotland and also state the objects of the company. The memorandum states that any person or more willing to form a company needs to incorporate the company with or without any liability (Ukcorporator.gov.uk, 2014), which they have already done in which they do not have much liability but to themselves and not to all the shareholders. The memorandum also states that it must have the company type whether it is a limited company with unlimited liability, privet limited company with limited liability and this is being fulfilled by the three owners as they have declared it as a private limited company with limited liability. This means that they would not be liable for protecting extra ordinary loses incurred by the shareholders but in case of a deterioration or degrading, they may just repay the debts on their books. The memorandum being redundant since the introduction of the Articles of Association, it is required that the Articles are thoroughly read through to conduct the business in any manner. Nick feeling unsatisfied and unconfident in being able to get a fair price by selling his shares to the existing shareholders is legitimate but his conduct of not attempting to sell the shares to his partners or internal shareholders is not advisable. Before attempting to sell it to existing shareholders Nick trying to sell it directly to external shareholders and bringing an outsider is a violation of the Articles of Association which requires him to sell it to existing shareholders, failing which he can approach an outsider and sell his shares. Nick has violated the Articles, following which David and George can appeal in the court against the conduct of Nick trying to sell his shares to an outsider without informing them.