论文代写：国际外交
霍华德和路易(1998)评论说,加拿大的中等国家外交和合理使用的语言,它不相称的影响国家在国际事务中,它展示了它独特的国家外交政策的品牌。问题是相同的中产权力的地位或是否拥有能够支持全国顺利通过当前和即将到来的世纪的动荡时期。然而这是因为一个国家成功的政策框架和保护其公民的权利,有一段时间,扩大超出其地区允许本身经济一体化或允许入站流的资源来避免被贴上一个隔离器的陷阱国家或傲慢的观察者。市场饱和,它本身需要更多的发展空间。它需要新领域的主导地位和显示,可以通过整合与其他国家通过全球化的措施。中央权力地位是一个好迹象有影响力的即使它是不足以被称为一个国家,但它的思想和方法对政策的形成,国际事务行为,冲突解决了全国同行中获得竞争优势。
论文代写：国际外交
Howard & Louis (1998) comments that Canada’s middle power diplomacy and the language it used justified the disproportionate influence the country has had in international affairs and it showcased it with a distinctive national foreign policy brand. The question is whether the same middle power status or possession is able to support the country to sail through the turbulent times in the current and upcoming century. This is because however successful a country is in its policy framework and protecting the rights of its citizens, there comes a time when it has to expand beyond its region for allowing itself to get economically integrated or allow inbound flow of resources to avoid being in the trap of being labelled as a isolator country or arrogant observer. Markets saturate and it requires more room to grow by itself. It requires new areas of dominance and display and this can be done by integrating with other countries by way of globalization measures. The middle power status is a good indication of it being influential even though it is not sizeable enough to be called a nation state, but its ideology and the approach towards policy formation, international affairs conduct, and conflict resolution has helped the country to gain a competitive advantage among its peers.
