essay代写：产品与创新管理
当TRIZ的方法被正确地使用，并且它的最佳实践集中于，那么就有可能解决与发明相关的问题。该理论的一个重要组成部分一直致力于进化模式。这种方法的模式是揭示和关键目标在于开发新系统发明的算法(Nambisan, 2013)。关键的部分还在于对现有的部分进行改进。该理论涉及到一种实用的方法，一套工具，一个基于知识和技术的模型，以产生创新性质的解决方案来解决问题。它的目的是应用于问题的制定、系统分析、故障分析和系统演化模式分析。根据这个理论，有三个关键的发现被破译了。第一个发现是问题和解决方案在整个行业中得到了重复。第二个发现是，技术进化模式也在整个科学和工业中得到重复。第三个发现是，创新利用了创新发展领域外部的科学影响。所有这些发现都被TRIZ的实践者所应用，从而开发和即兴的他们的服务、产品和系统。
essay代写：产品与创新管理
从市场表现分析，很明显，这款智能手机可能会弥补一个好的Android手机，但这仍然不符合市场预期。与竞争对手苹果(Apple)和三星(Samsung)相比，三星并不总是能提供足够的提升。智能手机并没有足够的性能属性来描述它与之前的Nexus系列相比的升级(Laperche et al.， 2013)。然而，从性能分析来看，谷歌显然也不能对此负责。2016年智能手机的市场已经达到成熟的水平，市场上有很多难以置信的选择。评价谷歌像素的关键意义在于确定产品在两个基本领域的定价方式。首先是要找出它是否是一个可靠的替代苹果I-phone深度硬件与适当的软件和良好的集成服务。第二点在于承认它是否比Android的其他旗舰产品提供了任何真正的好处。在这两种情况下，决定性的答案是没有。
essay代写：产品与创新管理
When the approach of TRIZ is used properly and its best practices are focused upon, then it becomes possible to tackle the issues related to invention. An essential component of the theory has been devoted towards the evolution patterns. The patterns are revealing and key objective of this approach lies in developing algorithms for new systems invention (Nambisan, 2013). The key component also lies in refining the current ones. The theory involves a practical method, sets of tools, a base of knowledge and technology based model to generate solutions of innovative nature to solve issues. It has been intended to apply towards formulation of issues, analysis of system, analysis of failure and system evolution patterns analysis. There are three key findings deciphered under this theory. The first finding is that issues as well as solutions mostly get repeated throughout industries. The second finding is that technical evolution patterns also get repeated throughout sciences and industries. The third finding is that innovation makes use of scientific influences external to the field wherein innovation is developed. All these findings are applied by practitioners of TRIZ so as to develop and improvise their services, products and also systems.
essay代写：产品与创新管理
From market performance analysis, it is evident that this smart phone might make up for a good Android phone, but this still does not match up with the expectations in the market. It doesn’t always offer sufficient bump in comparison to its competitors, Apple and Samsung. The smart phone does not have enough performance attributes to depict that it has justified the upgrade from its predecessor, the Nexus series (Laperche et al., 2013). However, from performance analysis, it is also evident that Google cannot be blamed for this. The market of smartphone’s by the year 2016 had already reached its level of maturity and there are many incredible choices in the market. The key meaningful manner of evaluating Google Pixel lies in determining the way in which the product fares in 2 essential domains. First is to find out whether it is a credible alternative to Apple I-phone deep hardware with appropriate software and good integration of service. The second lies in acknowledging whether it has provided any real benefits over other flagships of Android. In both these situations, the decisive answer is that it does not.
