本篇文章主要講文物遣返案件，可以看出，一些遣返案件突出表明，一些國家在全球舞台上維護了自己的地位，而不是僅僅考慮奪回以前的榮耀。 2010年，耶魯大學(Yale)皮博迪自然歷史博物館(Peabody Museum of Natural History)同意把一個世紀前探險家希拉姆賓漢三世(Hiram Bingham III)在馬丘比丘(Machu Picchu)出土的一些日常用品歸還給秘魯。本篇論文 代寫 價格文章由澳洲論文通AssignmentPass輔導網整理，供大家參考閱讀。
Some cases of repatriation can be seen underscoring nations which assert their place across the global stage instead of just considering reclaiming the previous glory. In the year 2010, Peabody Museum of Natural History in Yale agreed on returning to a number of everyday objects to Peru that was unearthed a century ago at Machu Picchu by Hiram Bingham III, the explorer.
As per the initially assessed cultural relics of China, the origin of this statue had been identified to be Yangchun that is a village of Datian County in the Fujian Province of China. It had been allegedly stolen in the year 1995 and an international transportation had been done, ultimately that fell under the authorities of Dutch collector. Considering the legal perspective, this statue of Buddhist monk has been identified as a stolen cultural piece by the State Administration of Cultural Heritage in China, and a number of negotiations are in progress with the Netherlands. Hence, it can be identified as disputable.
The government of China shows opposition to public auctions of any unlawfully stolen cultural property of China, while insisting to repatriate this kind of a property by international cooperation, ensuring the utilization of both, diplomatic and legal channels with respect to relevant international lawful principles and regimes. Also, there can be a consideration of international conventions offered by the government of China in order to protect the cultural objects. These include the following:
The Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property during Armed Conflict along with the protocols: This focuses on preventing the vandalism, pillage, theft and destruction of cultural objects in the duration of military occupation and armed conflict.
The Convention on the Means of Preventing and Prohibiting the Transfer, Export and Import for Ownership of Cultural Property: This focuses to combat the black lucrative market for antiques that have been smuggled.
The Convention on Illegally Exported or Stolen Cultural Objects: This is an attempt of inducing more countries for participating to repatriate the stolen culture based properties.
Recovering culture based object stolen by other international markets is a major problem with effective and rational consideration as identified by a number of researchers. Some problems can be in relation with traffic in the cultural and historical objects of China. These result in illicit excavation. The incident of Sitting Buddha Statue helps to demonstrate the legal difficulties being faced by China, as it is putting in efforts to retrieve the particular cultural objects. There are various challenges in context with the absolute legal channels related to the items. Even though there are some conventions and framework to support the process of repatriation, but due to the lack of evidence, the country may fail in receiving it back.