论文代写：法律
詹姆斯库克船长对澳大利亚印象深刻。当他回到英格兰时，他对乔治三世国王说，这是一个肥沃的地方，植被茂盛。詹姆斯库克应用了无主地的概念。有人认为，任何先到土地的人都可以在那里接管这片土地。当库克船长去澳大利亚时，他遇到了土着人。他总结说土地不是他们的土地。土着人没有像欧洲人那样表现自己的所有权。在这个范例中，库克船长决定这片土地可能会被英国殖民。这导致土着人民失去对土地的权利。即使在现代，这些讨论中的很多仍在进行。在这个范例中，沃森对土着法律有特殊的理解，并且理解了它与欧洲法律有何不同的细微差别（Lindqvist，2007）。作为开始的一步，我们讨论了英国政府为了与当地文化融合而作出的努力。有很多传教士被派往国内（Mercer，1993）。英国政府希望确保人民文明和教育。传教士为了向澳大利亚人民传播基督教的意识形态而作出了许多努力。英国政府的这一行动是为了确保土着人民学会过上与欧洲移民相同的文明生活。这些被发现与原生混淆（Mercer，1993）。
论文代写：法律
由于无主地的法定任务很难扭转，这对当地人来说是混乱的。英国的土地所有者决定澳大利亚土地是他们的，他们已经开始建设国家。在这个模式中，殖民地土地政策难以扭转。除此之外，所实施的殖民地土地政策产生了强大的政治力量，以确保政策的实施（Mercer，1993）。澳大利亚政府暗示了实地人类学。英国政府决定土着人民不文明。他们利用财产的概念。可以推论，如果英国政府从一开始就知道土着居民，他们可能已经认识到了人民的财产权利。一旦无主地的概念得到实施，当英国人的意见代表土着人开始的变化时，就不可能阻碍发展。直到1992年“马博”称号决定被采纳时，这项法律才受到阻碍或面临反弹（Reynolds，1996）。有人认为，无主地主的基本原则并不建立自己的标准。这种无主地理念最终被从澳大利亚法律的法定授权中删除。没有人知道现代法律是古老的。现在人们希望改变这个制度以支持公平的过程。独特的过程是针对土着法律的问题，艾琳沃森已经探索了无主地的概念。
论文代写：法律
Captain James Cook was impressed with Australia. When he returned to England, he told King George III that it was a fertile place that has rich vegetation. The concept of terra nullius was applied in James Cook. It was considered that anyone who got to the land first could be there to take over the land. When Captain Cook went to Australia, he met Aboriginal people. He concluded that the land is not their land. The Aboriginal people did not try to show their ownership like the people in Europe. In this paradigm, Captain Cook decided that the land could be colonized by the British. This leads to the Aboriginal people losing their rights to the land. Many of these discussions are currently going on even in the modern times. In this paradigm, Watson had a special understanding of the Aboriginal law and understood the specific nuances as to how it differed from the European Law (Lindqvist, 2007). As an inception step, there is discussion of the efforts taken by the British government to mingle with the local culture. There were a number of missionaries that were sent into the nation (Mercer, 1993). The British government wanted to ensure that the people were civilized and educated. There were a number of efforts taken by the missionaries to spread the ideology of Christianity to the people in Australia. This action by the British government was to ensure that the indigenous people learnt to live a civilized life that was equal to the European settlers. These were found to be confounding to the native (Mercer, 1993).
论文代写：法律
It is a confounding to the natives as the terra nullius legal mandates were very difficult to reverse. The British landowners decided that Australian land was theirs and they had started to build the nation. The colonial land policy is difficult to reverse in this schema. Added to this, the colonial land policy that was applied produced a powerful political force in order to ensure that the policy was in place(Mercer, 1993). The Australian government alluded the on-the-ground anthropology. British government decided that the Aboriginal people were not civilized. They exploited the conception of property. It could be reasoned that if the British government were aware of the Aborigines from the inception, they might have recognized the property rights of the people. Once the notion of terra nullius had been implemented, it was not possible to impede the development when the British people opinion represents the changes began by Aboriginal people. This law was impeded or faced a backlash only in 1992 when the “Mabo” title decision was take (Reynolds, 1996). It was argued in this that the fundamental tenets of terra nullius do not establish own standards. This concept of terra nullius was eventually removed from the legal mandates of the Australian law. It has been eluded that the law was archaic in the modern times. The people now want to change the system to favour a fair process. The unique process is taken on the issues of aboriginal laws and the notions of terra nullius has been explored by Irene Watson.
